Search for: "Donald Burgess"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2017, 8:06 am
"Democrats paralyzed as Gorsuch skates; The party is split over how aggressively to oppose Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee": Seung Min Kim and Burgess Everett of Politico.com have this report. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 6:25 pm
” James Arkin and Burgess Everett of Politico have this report. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm
That’s the opening sentence of this report by Burgess Everett in POLITICO. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 5:10 am
And Burgess Everett of Politico.com reports that "McConnell's Supreme Court gamble pays off in spades; The Senate majority leader, in tandem with Donald Trump, is poised to mold the high court for a generation. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 7:54 am
“Kavanaugh accuser has not yet agreed to attend hearing”: Elana Schor, Burgess Everett, and Eliana Johnson of Politico have this report. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Senator John Hoeven (R-ND), with Representatives Lizzie Fletcher (D-TX) and Michael Burgess (R-TX) introduced the legislation after President Donald Trump and Energy Secretary San Brouillette requested that the SPR be filled. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 11:22 pm
"To reach Donald Bradley, call 816-234-7810 or send e-mail to dbradley@kcstar.com. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:59 am
Coverage relating to recent remarks by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg critical of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump comes from Nick Gass, who reports for Politico that Trump himself responded to Ginsburg, while Michael Shear and Maggie Haberman do the same for The New York Times; and from Burgess Everett and Seung Min Kim, who report for Politico that “Democrats are struggling to defend Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s deepening criticism of”… [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:47 am
” by Eli Stokols and Burgess Everett for Politico North Carolina: “Appeals Court Considers North Carolina’s Controversial Voting Rules” by Ann Marimow for Washington Post [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am
Emmarie Huetteman of The New York Times reports on the “tango of praise and rejection” as Garland meets with senators, while Burgess Everett of Politico reports that “Democrats are getting badly outspent by their conservative rivals in the war over Merrick Garland’s confirmation, suggesting that President Barack Obama’s closest allies in the Supreme Court battle have more bark than bite. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:21 am
Originally Published July, 2003; Current Implications section added by Heidi Burgess in April 2017.What Is Moral Conflict? [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:20 am
With a Republican majority in both the House of Representatives and Senate, and President Donald J. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am
” Briefly: At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice and Comment blog, Bill Burgess looks at SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am
Briefly: At Casetext, Shaakirrah Sanders considers how the ‘constitutional implications of President Donald J. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 7:30 am
” At CNBC News, Brian Schwartz and Tucker Higgins discuss Judge Amy Coney Barrett, “widely seen as President Donald Trump’s most likely next pick” should a seat become vacant. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 9:54 am
At Reason TV (video), Randy Barnett discusses (among other things) “why Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was right to apologize for her critical remarks about” Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
This evening President Donald Trump is expected to announce his nominee to succeed Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 7:15 am
By Donald M. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:17 pm
The Prize game: Lawful Looting on the High Seas in the Days of Fighting Sail, by Donald A. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:09 am
” For Politico, Elana Schor and Burgess Everett report that Kavanaugh’s performance at the hearing is “not stopping the Supreme Court nominee’s liberal critics from unleashing new ads and grass-roots campaigns in one last shot at derailing him” by “keep[ing] pressure on the dwindling number of senators still undecided on President Donald Trump’s high court pick. [read post]
